Task Force on the Low Back Pain Clinical Practice Guidelines. American Osteopathic Association Guidelines for Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) for Patients With Low Back Pain. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016;116(8):536-549. doi:10.7556/jaoa.2016.107
Evans DW. Osteopathic principles: More harm than good? International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2013;16(1):46-53. doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2012.08.006
O’Cathain A, Croot L, Duncan E, et al. Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e029954. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029954
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2013;50(5):587-592. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.010
Skivington K, Matthews L, Craig P, Simpson S, Moore L. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: updating Medical Research Council guidance to take account of new methodological and theoretical approaches. The Lancet. 2018;392:S2. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32865-4
Licciardone JC, Stoll ST, Fulda KG, et al. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2003;28(13):1355-1362. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000067110.61471.7D
Boutron I, Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF, Ravaud P, CONSORT NPT Group. CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(1):40-47. doi:10.7326/M17-0046
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1655
Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008;148(4):295-309.
Nguyen C, Boutron I, Zegarra-Parodi R, et al. Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment vs Sham Treatment on Activity Limitations in Patients With Nonspecific Subacute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. Published online March 15, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0005
Howick J, Webster RK, Rees JL, et al. TIDieR-Placebo: A guide and checklist for reporting placebo and sham controls. PLoS Med. 2020;17(9):e1003294. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003294
Braithwaite FA, Walters JL, Moseley GL, Williams MT, McEvoy MP. Towards more credible shams for physical interventions: A Delphi survey. Clinical Trials. 2020;17(3):295-305. doi:10.1177/1740774520910365
UK BEAM Trial Team. United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. BMJ. 2004;329(7479):1377. doi:10.1136/bmj.38282.669225.AE
Sleszynski SL, Glonek T. Outpatient Osteopathic SOAP Note Form: preliminary results in osteopathic outcomes-based research. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005;105(4):181-205.
Noll DR, Degenhardt BF, Morley TF, et al. Efficacy of osteopathic manipulation as an adjunctive treatment for hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial. Osteopath Med Prim Care. 2010;4:2. doi:10.1186/1750-4732-4-2
Testa M, Rossettini G. Enhance placebo, avoid nocebo: How contextual factors affect physiotherapy outcomes. Man Ther. 2016;24:65-74. doi:10.1016/j.math.2016.04.006
Menke JM. Manual therapy researchers are misled by natural history and placebo effects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(23):1997. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000585
Zou K, Wong J, Abdullah N, et al. Examination of overall treatment effect and the proportion attributable to contextual effect in osteoarthritis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(11):1964-1970. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208387
Rossettini G, Carlino E, Testa M. Clinical relevance of contextual factors as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects in musculoskeletal pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):27. doi:10.1186/s12891-018-1943-8
Consorti G, Marchetti A, De Marinis MG. What Makes an Osteopathic Treatment Effective From a Patient’s Perspective: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020;43(9):882-890. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.02.003
Thomson OP, Petty NJ, Moore AP. Osteopaths’ professional views, identities and conceptions – A qualitative grounded theory study. Int J Ost Med. 2014;17(3):146-159. doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2013.12.002
Fryer G. Somatic dysfunction: An osteopathic conundrum. Int J Osteopath Med. 2016;22:52-63. doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2016.02.002
Esteves JE, Zegarra-Parodi R, van Dun P, Cerritelli F, Vaucher P. Models and theoretical frameworks for osteopathic care – A critical view and call for updates and research. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2020;35:1-4. doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2020.01.003
Fryer G. Integrating osteopathic approaches based on biopsychosocial therapeutic mechanisms. Part 1: The mechanisms. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2017;25:30-41. doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2017.05.002
This webinar will be presented by Dr Christelle Nguyen, MD, PhD and Mr Rafael Zegarra-Parodi, DO (UK), co-authors of the paper published on March 15th, 2021 in the JAMA Internal Medicine, and moderated by Pr Paul Vaucher, DO (CH), PhD.
During this webinar, the results of this randomized controlled trial will be presented with commentaries and discussion from both medical and osteopathic perspectives.
Here’s what you can expect to learn from the session:
- The need for methodological innovations to investigate osteopathic care.
- The importance of modeling all potential active components of osteopathic care.
- The value of osteopathic care beyond body-centered models.
- A chance to pose any remaining questions to our speakers.
The webinar will be in English language and the recording of the session will be available on COME Collaboration’s website after the live event.
